The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates the amount of money earning from exports in Someland in two years 2005 and 2015 which put together a plan for 2025.
Overall, while meat and dairy products have generated more revenue since 2005, international tourism sectors is planned to reach the highest amount of money gaining from exports. Besides all sectors will increase from year to year.
It is obviously seen in the chart that, meat products in 2005 was larger exports than other years, about 4 billions USD. However, this figure reduced stably in 2015 by about 1 billions USD. In sharp contrast, The dairy products was exported in 2015 was over 8 billions dollar which was far higher than this figure in 2005 with nearly 4.5 billions dollar. At the same period of time, International tourism witnessed a decrease while the money in this section reduce from nearly 6.5 billions dollar to just slightly over 6 billions dollar.
According to future projection, the international tourism will gain the top position with around 8 billions USD in 2025. This sectors is estimated to follow by dairy products with over 8.5 billions dollar. The meat products is planned to take the bottom position with nearly 3.5 billion dollar which will be a half of dairy products exporting in 2025.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | habeeb omran | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | Krushnagopal | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
- some people think charity organizations should help people in great need whenever they live. However, others think they should help people in their own country. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 73
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology ofdeveloping countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to2010. 67
- some people argue that countries should have a moral obligation to help each other on the other hand some people argue that a large amount of aid money does not reach the poor of the world Discuss both view and give your opinion 72
- some people believe that the country would benefit a lot from more young people entering into university. However, others think that the large number of people receiving college education only leads to graduate unemployment. Discuss both view and give you 73
- the information below gives the details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK in 2010 and 2013 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng from exports in Someland in two years 2005 and 2015 which put together a plan ...
^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he chart that, meat products in 2005 was larger exports than other years, about 4...
^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nearly 4.5 billions dollar. At the same period of time, International tourism witnessed a decr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ion with around 8 billions USD in 2025. This sectors is estimated to follow by dairy...
^^^^
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...nd 8 billions USD in 2025. This sectors is estimated to follow by dairy products w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95327102804 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42117410047 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528037383178 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1666537967 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101258866202 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518356730093 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528766977679 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786790467171 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608096902481 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.