The bar chart illustrates the date about exports in Southland for 2000, 2021, and for future 2025.
Overall, it can be seen that the major exports in Southland are changing over the period.
It is clear from the chart that the leader exports in 2000 were in meat products; at present, it is dairy products and international tourism will be in 2025. In 2000 almost 8 billion pounds of international tourism were exported from Southland and it fell over time. Dairy products reach at about 10 billion at present. Meat products worth 6 million pounds were exported in 2000, which is seen declined by 4 billion now (2021), and is set to decline to 5 billion in 2025. However, the value is predicted to decline by 4 billion by the end of the period.
Turning to international tourism, almost a uniform growth is seen in the export value throughout the period (from 8 billion to an anticipated value of 10 billion pounds). International tourism demonstrated a constant rise in these given periods of time.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003 2012 89
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 78
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 67
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city center from 2003 2012
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78735632184 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71442689294 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488505747126 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.517403369 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16827355338 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086412524941 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115329870659 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146164173911 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148086195147 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.