The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in 2000, *20.., and further projections for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart presented shows the value of exports for international tourism, dairy products and meat products in Southland in three different years: 2000, 2021 and a projection for 2025.
Between 2000 and 2021 we can see a grow of International tourism and in the dairy products, the first one with a value of almost 1 billion more, bringing its value to 9 billion, and the second one starting from 7 billion in 2020 and reaching almost 10 billion in 2021.
Things change regarding previsions for 2025. Indeed, we can see an approximate 1 billion growth in international tourism (10 billion total) but a small recession in dairy products (9.5 billion).
About Meat production, the least of the three regarding exports, we can see a slow decrease during years, starting from 6 billion in 2020 and dropping to 5 billion in 2025. It is a drop of 1 billion but, differently from the other two categories analysed, it is the only productions that present a steady decrease.
The chart has showed how international tourism, daily products and meat products in southland changed and will change differently during these periods.
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and further projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Other think that it is better to work for different organisation 56
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many case theh people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003 2012 Summarise and information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...25. Between 2000 and 2021 we can see a grow of International tourism and in the dai...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96296296296 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84436688922 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534391534392 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6898099613 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0815299739648 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051932429767 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058820210269 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601049349941 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598492949227 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.