This chart shows us the giving financial assesment's amount and its age comparision of British people in the years 1990 and 2010. Every year the 36-50 and 51-65 age-groups donated the most money to the charity in the first place. The indicators of 26-35 years old charitable people and that of the people who over 65 were almost equal (over 30%)in 1990, but in 2010 the percentage of former fell to 23%,that of latter rose to 35%. The least ones are 18-25 age-class, I think the young had no chance to give extra money to the needy people, when they were in the beginning of new life. Moreover the first three groups donated more money in 1990 than 2010. In contrast the other two groups' rate is higher in 2010.
As for middle aged men, they were active to give a donation in both years. The highest percentage among all age groups was viewed on 36-50 year olds with 43% in 1990.
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 56
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of boys and girls who participate in 4 kinds of sport outside school hours including the percentage of those who do not
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 584, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...they were in the beginning of new life. Moreover the first three groups donated more mon...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 657, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...onated more money in 1990 than 2010. In contrast the other two groups rate is higher in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, as for, i think, in contrast, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 718.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43209876543 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09564037492 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0104154613 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275049185451 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117071686796 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612116386669 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2108162981 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457535123616 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.