The bar chart illustrates five pair columns of 1990 and 2010, which reflect British citizens’ age classification from 18 to 65 and more, as well as their donation to charity, measured in percentage.
The minimum backing to charity was granted by adults, age of 18 to 25 in both years. It represents approximately 17 percent in 1990 and about 7 percent in 2010.
The apogee result of 1990 illustrates the third column, the people at the age of 36 to 50, leading in the chart by compiling more than 40 percent. The maximum point of 2010 was occupied by elders, age of 51 to 65, drawn up just near to 40 percent. In 1990, 42% of the 36-50 age-group made charitable donations, and this figure is the highest on the chart.
Obviously, between first and second bars is observed sharp rise from 15 to 30 percent in 1990, from 7 to 24 percent in 2010. Also, in both years was demonstrated about 10 percent increase in charity contribution between second and third columns. In addition, the British population of varied age category funded exactly identical 35 percents in different years.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to charity, measured in percentage. The minimum backing to charity was grant...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt in 1990 and about 7 percent in 2010. The apogee result of 1990 illustrates th...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is figure is the highest on the chart. Obviously, between first and second bars...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74736842105 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74633979534 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9571165859 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148607184853 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066890858537 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207924044978 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096136641559 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159614418512 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.