This chart shows the percentage of charitable funds available to British in the 1990s and 2010s. Charitable donations were made up of citizens between the age of 18 and 65, and the figure was divided into 5 age groups: 18-25, 26-35, 36-50, 51-65 and over 65 years old.
Within 5 groups, we can see lowest overall score in groups 18-25. However, 1990 figure in this column is 10% higher than the 2010 figure. The highest figure in the chart is 45%, which is in the 36-50 group in 1990, compared to the group's 2010 figure of 35%. However, in 2010, charitable funds were allocated mainly to those aged 51-65, which is 39%, and in 1990, 35% of the fund was donated to this group.
It can be seen that in both years, the largest fund was allocated mainly to British citizens, aged 36 to 65 years. The 26-35 group columns are higher than the previous group columns, showing 31% in 1990 and 24% in 2010. And for those over 65, the fund allocated less interest than other groups: 32% in 1990 and 35% in 2010.
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'see the lowest'.
Suggestion: see the lowest
... years old. Within 5 groups, we can see lowest overall score in groups 18-25. However,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44324324324 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10070773145 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6473625371 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123822033262 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620712991838 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266917034093 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942643631293 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00726316964213 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.