The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The following on the bar chart is considered on the facts distributive of British population presenting donation by maturity succession in 1990 and 2010 years.

We can show that the financial gifts of British people are more in 1990 years than in 2010 year.

In 1990, more 15 percentage of humans from 18 to 25 age is donate but fewer 10 % people between 18 and 25 age help money in 2010 year.
30% more People from 26 to 35 age present money in 1990 year and less 25 percentage humans helped financial in 2010 year. The higest statistic of aid financial demonstraed by persons between 36 and 5o age in 1990. More of 40 % people between this age help by financial resource in 1990.
Almost 35 %of people from 36 to 5o age assist by money resource.

The bigger 51 % of people donate more in 2010 year than in 1990 year. In 2010, Fewer 40 % but more 35 % of opeople between 51 and and 65 ages help with money resource. In 1990, This persons is almost 35 %. 35 percentage of people over the 65 years old dotate in 2020 and fewer 35 percentage of bigger 65 years old people help by financial resource in 1990

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'donated'.
Suggestion: donated
...rcentage of humans from 18 to 25 age is donate but fewer 10 % people between 18 and 25...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to 5o age assist by money resource. The bigger 51 % of people donate more in...
^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...0 % but more 35 % of opeople between 51 and and 65 ages help with money resource. In 19...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ages help with money resource. In 1990, This persons is almost 35 %. 35 percentage o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otate in 2020 and fewer 35 percentage of bigger 65 years old people help by finan...
^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople help by financial resource in 1990
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41463414634 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39213050612 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414634146341 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5375387176 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2727272727 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236779460115 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119601116012 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478756341565 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148089645704 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329796768197 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.