The graph shows the facts on the percentage of British people saving money for good benejends from range since 1990 to 2010.
The cahrt show that in 1990 British people from 18-25 years old has gived 17% money to charity, but the chart correctly shows that in 2010 British people was gived just 7% money for charity. Britanians from 25-35 years old peoples saved 3% money for charityu in 1990. In 2010 they are was saved just 24% from their treasures. In 1990 peoples from 36-50 years old had gived 35% money for charity in 1990, but in 2010 they are gived 39% then peoples from 65 years old and elders saved 33% money but in 2010 they are saved 35% money for charity.
Also the chart show to charity 1990 peoples gived money to charity minimum 17%. and maximum 42%. But in 2010 has gived money to charity minimum 7% and maximum 39%.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: evalinalisbeth
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... for charityu in 1990. In 2010 they are was saved just 24% from their treasures. In...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... they are saved 35% money for charity. Also the chart show to charity 1990 peoples ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...les gived money to charity minimum 17%. and maximum 42%. But in 2010 has gived mone...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 682.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42857142857 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.81451392554 2.65546596893 68% => OK
Unique words: 68.0 106.607317073 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441558441558 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 178.2 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.3603138588 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.25 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516127477566 0.215688989381 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.253344055539 0.103423049105 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14717744867 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368390730949 0.15604864568 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443376276398 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.42 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.