The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

The bar chart provides information about disbursement on five consumer products (cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras) in France and UK in 2010.

Overall, UK spend most amount of the money on cars, books and cameras, while expenditure on perfume and computers was higher in France, compared to UK. Both UK and France spent majority of their money on cars whereas the least amount of money was spent on perfume in UK, compraed to cameras in France.

In 2010, total money spent on cars was £400,000 in France, beign lower than UK by approximately £51,000. Least amount of money was spent on cameras, which was £150,000 in France. France spent about £380,000 and £300,000 on computers and books respectively. On perfume, France spent £100,000 less than amount of money spent on books.

UK spent about £350,000 on cameras, which reported huge difference in expenditure pattern of UK and France. Approximately £110,000 more spent on books in UK than France. Expenditure on computers was over double than expenditure on perfume in UK. Majority of money was spent on cars in UK, being highr than France by approximately £51,000.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...lower than UK by approximately £51,000. Least amount of money was spent on cameras, w...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12299465241 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75986605617 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411764705882 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0085215926 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0599273215614 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346383558117 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477989201717 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582359240358 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497998325064 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.