A glance at the pie charts provided reveals the proportion of male and female arrested within five years until 1994, while the bar chart below illustrates the percentage of criminal charges divided by genders.
Overall, there had been more males than females arrested within these five years. The principal charge for both genders is public drinking.
By 1994, there were 32% of males got arrested with over 30% of them drinking in public, and approximately 26% of them drunk driving. The proportion of females who were arrested was much lower, with only 9%. However, nearly 37% of them were accused of drinking in public, and only around 14% of women were drunk driving.
According to the survey, other changes such as breach of the order and theft were mostly offended by men with about 17% and 16% respectively. Nearly 20% of women were arrested due to assault, while only just over 15% of men offended this crime. Other prisoners were not willing to reveal the reasons why they were arrested.
- After leaving school or university young people should choose a job or career that they love rather than one that pays the best salary To what extent do you agree with this statement 88
- The pie chart and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continuous throughout life. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92941176471 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3439829469 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9118083615 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226725808002 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874067509168 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654039319311 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138365129572 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617893885854 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.