The two pie charts illustrate the percentage of university students in Britain who could speak more than one language besides English over the duration of a decade, from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, more students were able to speak Spanish over both periods, while students who expressed German only or two other languages comprised the least percentages.
In 2000, Spanish-speaking students constituted the largest demographic, at 30%. This figure rose slightly by 5% a decade later. Similarly, those who were fluent in another language besides English also saw an increase from 15 to 20% by the end of the period. In contrast, French-speaking students experienced the inverse of this change over time.
On the other hand, the proportion of students who knew no other language except English accounted for 20% in 2000. This statistic decreased by half, ten years later, while students proficient in German only or two other languages experienced no change over the duration, remaining constant at 10%.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 84
- You have recently moved to a different house Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter Explain why you have moved Describe the new house Invite your friend to come and visit 73
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, similarly, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89483130037 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4102771032 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373545943422 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157624526596 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937038189018 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232588516819 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262749265287 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.