The two pie charts compare the different retail sectors that comprise internet shopping sales in Canada, in the years 2005 to 2010.
Overall, at the beginning of the period, Electronics and Appliance accounted for the majority of online sales, while Video Games made up the smallest sector. In comparison, at the end of the period. Food and Beverage became the largest retail sector, and Home Furnishings made the lowest contribution to online shopping sales.
In 2005, 35% of online sales came from Electronics and Appliance. This figure dropped by 5% just five years later. In contrast, Food and Beverage experienced a significant rise from 22 to 32%. This sector replaced Electronics and Appliance as the largest contributor to online shopping sales by the end of the period.
On the other hand, Home Furnishings accounted for 25% of sales in 2005, while Video Games held a mere 18%. These figures fell and rose by 10 and 5%, respectively, at the end of the five-year period.
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that children s leisure activities must be educational otherwise they are a complete waste of time Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 56
- High stakes English language tests such as IELTS are increasingly being delivered on the computer Do the advantages of computer based testing outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowl 95
- STRESS-RELATED ILLNESSES ARE BECOMING INCREASINGLY COMMON.WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE CAUSES OF THIS?WHAT SOLUTIONS CAN YOU SUGGEST? 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7158183379 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55487804878 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8434526069 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243026730787 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973134624028 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10274440653 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171547262624 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115087244849 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.