The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status

The bar graph shows, leisure time distribution related to employment status and its comparison in both genders, in a week, between years 1998-1999. Overall unemployed and retired people were the two main groups who had the most leisure time.

Regardless of sex, unemployed people and retired people had more time than the other groups for leisure activities, with roughly equal hours in both groups 82 hours for man and 78 hours for woman. For males, this number was followed by full time workers with 42 hours. Full-time Employed women could arrange only 35 hours for leisure activities, in contrast housewives and part-time workers had more time for leisure activities than full-time female workers with 50 hours for former and 35 hours latter one.

Strikingly, Part time male employees could not arrange anytime for leisure activities or data is missing. They were also not involved in housewife category though we knew that some of the males do the housework.

Votes
Average: 9.7 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... For males, this number was followed by full time workers with 42 hours. Full-time Employ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: Part-time
...nd 35 hours latter one. Strikingly, Part time male employees could not arrange anytim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... housewife category though we knew that some of the males do the housework.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15189873418 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48891147687 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2135142441 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17248525486 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847954299888 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571770452545 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119895504098 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047661385872 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.