The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organizations from 2008 to 2011.
The given chart provides information on how much money 5 different organizations donated to developing countries during the 4-year surveyed period, from 2008 to 2011.
Overall, from 2008 to 2011, the highest amount of money given to developing countries belonged to Organization 2 with a clear upward trend throughout the years. Organization 5 experienced a steep decrease in how much money they spent whereas organization 4 was observed to give the least amount of money.
In 2008, organization 2 spent roughly 1.3 million on developing countries. This number rose steadily to 1.5 million in 2009 before skyrocketing to almost 2.5 million in 2010. In 2011, the number was recorded at 2.6 million, a record high.
In comparison, the amount of money Organization 4 gave developing countries in 2008 was observed at 0.6 million less than Organization 2, at only 0.7 million. This amount fluctuated over the years to finally reached an all-time low number of 0.4 million in 2011.
Organization 5 in 2008 donated approximately the same amount as organization 2. However, over the years, they gradually decreased the overall amount of money spent on developing countries by 0.8 million to arrive at the number of 0.5 million in 2011.
Organization 3 somewhat maintained the amount given during the surveyed period, with a final number of 1.5 million in 2011, whereas organization 1 experienced a slight increase of 0.1 million to 0.7 million in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-11 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
- The tables compare working hours of full-time and part-time workers in Greece, Netherlands, and the UK compared to European average in 2002. 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impo 62
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 70
- The graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2170212766 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03098231271 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476595744681 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6027701088 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.454545455 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392151036793 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187247388645 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130535573035 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255846190691 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121541122142 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.