The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar chart indicates the information for how much money that British people whose different level of income spent on fast food items and the line graph shows the consumption of three kinds of fast food in Britain from year 1970 to 1990.
From the bar chart, it shows in 1990, British people who had high level of income spent over 40 thousands in hamburger weekly and the figure was the highest one from all. But they just spent 17 thousand of money on fish & chips while for pizza, they spent about 19 thousand. For people whose earning stay in the middle level, hamburger also was the most popular kinds of fast food and around 33 thousand dollar had been spent on this food item. Followed by it was fish & chips, which people spent 25 thousand on it and the third was pizza. Finally, fish & chips gained the highest popular in the low income group. They spent around 16 thousand dollars per week. And only few of them like to consume pizza since just 6 thousand of money had been spent on it.
The line graph shows that people tend to consume more fish & chips and hamburger from 1970 to 1990. And less people ate pizza. In 1970, 300 gram of pizza had been consumed which much higher than hamburger and fish & chips. But the consumption decreased and between the year of 1980 to 1985 it had been outnumbered by fish & chips and after 1985 it then outnumbered by hamburger. In 1990, fish & chips became the most popular which 500 gram consumed in that year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-15 | Cheesee | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | mehaksandhu | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | teenieteens | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | sattar_iust | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment. It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional past times than spending all day indoors.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The diagram presents the process of producing smoked fish 61
- Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The two charts below compare the populations of France and India in the age distribution and gender in 1984. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ps and hamburger from 1970 to 1990. And less people ate pizza. In 1970, 300 gram of ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...And less people ate pizza. In 1970, 300 gram of pizza had been consumed which much h...
^^^^
Line 9, column 436, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...chips became the most popular which 500 gram consumed in that year.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54339622642 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07709525994 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467924528302 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2762829396 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6153846154 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186034641427 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695936404483 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847091225584 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167111591825 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118348942524 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.3 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.