The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The following chart depicts how much money was spent on fast foods by Britain people per week, with the graph illustrating trends to do with fast food consumption.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, three types of fast food, including hamburgers, fish and chips, and pizza were surveyed. Around 45 pence per person was spent by high incomers to buy hamburgers. Followed by nearly 35 pence of average incomers and less than 15 pence of people who have low income. While high income individuals spent approximately the same amount of money on fish and chips and pizza, which is around 17 pence in a week, the average income people spent far much money on fish and chips (25 pence), rather than 10 pence of pizza. The story of low-income people was completely different. They bought more fish and chips, nearly 20 pence per week, in comparison with about 12 pence on pizza.
Turning to the graph, there were two distinct trends: upward and downward. Hamburger consumption experienced a dramatic rise from less than 100 grammes in 1970 to more than 500 grammes in 1990. The same pattern was observable in pizza. It went up from 50 to about 300 grammes during 1970 till 1990. However, fish and chips consumption declined from more than 300 grammes to 200 grammes between 1970 and 1985, whereas a slight increase was observable during next five years.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that, low-income earners spent far less money to purchase fast foods in comparison with high incomers, while the trends of fast-food consumption were upward in all three types of fast foods at the end of surveying period, albeit one group witnessed a significant fall at first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-15 | Cheesee | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | mehaksandhu | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | teenieteens | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | sattar_iust | 73 | view |
- Rather than choose a subject that is suitable for future employment possibilities you should choose a subject that you interested in or could get good grades Agree or disagree 83
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- In education is to learn life values and ethics as important to learn practical skills for future development 77
- Some people think that younger employees often have more skills knowledge and motivation than the old employees To what extent do you agree with it Use your experience 85
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83275261324 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45167451183 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6067341425 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214953099274 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735476540618 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101944175976 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178262502357 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124076274334 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.