Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of responsibilities of rich countries against poorer nations and its corresponding impacts have sparked a worldwide dispute. In this regard, although developing countries must struggle to enhance their conditions in terms of health, education, and trade, putting more responsibilities on the shoulders of wealthy nations to help the poorer counterparts should be taken into consideration. In my mind, rich nations could assist the poorer ones regarding financial as well as educational aspects.
Obviously, a wise approach to promote unwealthy nations’ health and education is money. Providing developing countries with funds, whether loans or charity-purpose budgets, by wealthy nations paves the way to improve wellbeing and education among poor areas. For instance, under circumstance of today’s Covid19 pandemic, if modern countries take more responsibility with respect to raise money on preparing vaccine to poorer nations, it probably will lead to elimination of the disease at not distant future across the entire globe.
Moreover, majority of poorer countries suffer from the lack of education and a proper education system rather than financial deficiencies. Developed countries are capable of sending various types of experts to poorer countries, and so aid them to come up with innovative, efficient curriculum. Hence, they would experience improvements in all aspects thanks to sophisticated and appropriate education system which is prepared by wealthy nations’ cooperation.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of opponents. They are of the opinion that, it is the responsibility of governors and monarchs of poorer states, rather than rich countries, to endeavor in flourishing their nations. They elucidate that through colossal natural resources, of which specific so-called poor nations such as African countries own, they have the ability to become far healthier and richer than today’s modern nations.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that wealthy countries should accept more responsibility about health, education, and trade of poorer areas. Who knows one day in next centuries, today’s the wealthiest, most powerful country would turn to a wretched, miserable one?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | nijam | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Guiseppe59192 | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Guri473812 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life Discuss 88
- Talk about an invention that you think beneficial or harmful 11
- the charts below give information on ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge Write a 89
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76176470588 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13830420565 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1049309038 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.928571429 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331181562513 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108429736302 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597680356145 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176108565946 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782483899354 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.