The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods

Here, the chart represents money that is spent on three different fast food stuffs (Hamburgers, Fish and chips, and Pizza) by Britain people, whilst the graph indicates the trend of intake of such fast foods over two decades from 1970 and units are measured in pence. Overall, it is noticeable that Hamburgers had dominated the market, Pizza had grow in popularity and trend of Fish and Chips had fluctuated at the same trend could be found in general. A glance at the reflects that, Hamburgers is most popular among affluents who spent more than forty per person per week, whilst mediocre group and poor people budget around thirty and fifteen spent respectively. The intake of Pizza also represent the same trend as Hamburgers but the consumption was half and less than that. Fish and Chips are expended optimum by moderate income group, while high and low income people roughly spent the same amount. Analysis of the graph reveals that the intake of Hamburgers and Pizza was less than hundred grams in 1970 and the intake of both had increased by risen more than five fold over stipulated period of time. The expenditure Fish and Chips add caption till 1985 the same improvement in the end.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...ers had dominated the market, Pizza had grow in popularity and trend of Fish and Chi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...ers had dominated the market, Pizza had grow in popularity and trend of Fish and Chi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 987, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...e of Hamburgers and Pizza was less than hundred grams in 1970 and the intake of both ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1091, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...sen more than five fold over stipulated period of time. The expenditure Fish and Chips add cap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81463414634 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33630529408 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2831324739 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213890986124 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863761915283 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10294612255 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213890986124 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.