The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
A glance at the provided bar chart reveals the number of money on purchasing six different items in Europe countries, including Germany, Italy, France, and Britain.
On balance, Britons paid more money than others for all goods. Moreover, the money purchased for photographic film was highest in out of six items.
Most of the money was spent on photographic film in Britain, at nearly 170 thousand pounds, followed by that on toys and CDs in also Britain with approximately 165 thousand pounds, respectively. On the other hand, the wasted money in Germany was the smallest in out of 4 countries, with nearly 140000 pounds for each.
The figures for Italy and France roughly lie on these two extremes, and money spent in Italy appears higher than that in France for almost items. In France, the most money spent on photographic film, at over 160,000 pounds, by contrast, the figure for tennis was the lowest one, around 145000 pounds, which also is the minimum figure shown on the chart. Furthermore, in Italy, the payment for all items shares a comparable figure with over 150 thousand pounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | shayma | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 67 | view |
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development ? 78
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Writing task 1 the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 78
- The diagram below show how leather goods are producted. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98378378378 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54074754763 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545945945946 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1456124688 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0830321089718 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407513777747 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350220951668 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606398221726 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334945716373 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.