The chart below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years .
The line graph illustrates the number of garbage produced by Company A, B, and C from 2000 to 2015. Units are measured in tonnes.
Overall, Company C has increased its number of garbage production, while Company B and C went down throughout the period .
It is noticeable that Company C started its recorded data with roughly just above 3 tonnes as opposed to Company A of around 12 tonnes, which marked as the highest point among the three companies. However, the trend of Company C continued to move up rapidly until 2015 reaching just above 10 tonnes, whereas Company A fell gradually to approximately 8 tonnes.
Meanwhile, Company B as the second highest on waste produced with figures of about 8 tonnes in 2000 and grew slightly about a tonne in 2005. Over 10 years period, these figures sharply dropped and hitting its lowest point to approximately 3 tonnes in the end year,2015.
- The chart below shows the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The charts show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1998 and 2000 67
- The charts below show the average spending for British in 1971 and 2001. 78
- The chart below indicates the primary uses of Internet in Japan in the years 1995 to 2005. 73
- The chart below gives information on how much people in the United States and United Kingdom spend on petrol
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... B and C went down throughout the period . It is noticeable that Company C star...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85620915033 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70171231848 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6163657672 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216474937376 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093665033333 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464765160129 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125948405009 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372538200538 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.