The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart depicts the number of rentals and sales of films in a specific store annualy from 2002 to 2011.

Overall, there was a fluctuation in the figure of DVD sales throughout the given period. Meanwhile, the number of films rentals witnessed a downward trend between 2002 and 2011.

Turning to detail, in terms of the largest figure, the DVD sales reached a pinnacle in 2007, standing at over 210 thousand. By the same token, in the year 2002 observed the dominant number in the rentals of films, arriving at nearly 185 thousand. Besides, there is the lowest figure of DVD sales in 2002, accounting for almost 50 thousand. Likewise, Rentals of films saw the lowest number in 2011, hitting at nearly 51 thousand.

The most striking point is that there was no document of the VHS sales and Blu-ray sales in the year 2006. However, the sales of Blu-ray commenced in 2007, and continued to rise gradually until 2011, growing from under five thousand in 2007 to over 10 thousand in 2011.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, likewise, while, by the same token

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74285714286 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35970250633 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1660671385 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236449182051 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115199720133 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935669946028 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180476743714 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864111547963 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.