The chart below shows the average cost of monthly
contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a
European country from January to September 2002,
measured in euro.
The chart illustrates the average price of monthly plans from four cell phone contractors in a European nation inthe first three quarters of 2002.
Overall, there was an increase in the figures for all companies, except for Sim TX whose price remained unchangedover the period shown. In addition, the monthly cost of Alpha’s contract experienced the most remarkable growth.Alpha originally offered the lowest price in the beginning of 2002 at only 5 euros per month. The price remained relatively stable during the next 5 months before a surge to 25 euros in September, which made Alpha the most expensive contractor examined. Meanwhile, Domo’s users had to pay the highest price for the majority of 2002
as the price rose gradually from January to July, followed by a slight decrease to about 23 euros by September.
Similarly, there was gradual growth in the price of Lex’s contract, from approximately 12 euros in January to 17 euros in September. On the other hand, afer peaking at 14 euros in June, the average cost of Sim TX decreased and returned toits original price of 8 euros
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millionsof tonnes, from three different sources, between1990 and 2005. 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one twon who rode bicycles in 2011 56
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Alpha
... experienced the most remarkable growth.Alpha originally offered the lowest price in t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, while, except for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04371584699 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84189783244 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7228900053 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204698246553 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102911302315 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589731807975 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141960993319 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514958626591 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.