The chart below shows the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden and Portugal between 1967 and 2007

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in the United Kingdom ,Italy , Sweden, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

The line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal, and Sweden for over 40 years, starting in 1967.

Overall, carbon dioxide emitted per person in Italy and Portugal has a gradual increase throughout the period, while Sweden decreased. Although the United Kingdom went down significantly it remains on top of the four countries.

Carbon dioxide emitters in Italy and Portugal started the period with roughly a metric tonne and just above 4 metric tonnes respectively. The data continued to move up to approximately 7.5 metric tonnes and 5.5 respectively at the end year given.

Meanwhile , in Britain, the amount of CO2 emitted per person began at about 10.5 metric tonnes, modestly went down until 2007 to just above 8 metric tonnes. The figure has stayed the same as the highest point of the three countries. Even though Sweden was on the second rank from 1990, the data drops from around 8.5 metric tonnes to about 5.5 metric tonnes, which marked as the lowest point same with Portugal as the figure collides in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-11 an-an 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mitted per person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal, and Sweden for over 4...
^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal, and Sweden for over 40 years, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...out the period, while Sweden decreased. Although the United Kingdom went down significan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ely at the end year given. Meanwhile , in Britain, the amount of CO2 emitted p...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01098901099 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44884356004 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3081877539 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261624137522 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114924693824 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103869888549 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184030544298 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977034439371 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.