The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001.
It is the disparity in the percentage of car ownership of each household, which is illustrated in the line chart. The data was taken in the Great Britain, from 1961 to 2001.
Generally, car was a less popular item in the 1960s then it was in the 2000s.
To be more specifically, in 1961, around 65% families have no car at all, about one third afforded to have one car, and hardly found any family who owned two cars or more.
During the next 20 years period, there was a significant change in the car ownership percentage, with half of the households owned a car, as well as nearly 15% of those purchased two cars. In accompanied to that rate, the percentage of households without a car dropped rapidly to about 35%.
There was a sharp increase in the number of families purchased two or more cars, which was just under 30%, in 2001. Households with only one car still were recorded as the majority, but the proportion decreased slightly to approximately 43%, while the proportion of households owned no car continued to experience a downward trend. Such a rate was estimated as less than 30% in the same year.
- Nowadays, the traditions and customs relating to the food we eat and the way we eat are changing. Why is it happening? Do you think this kind of change is positive or negative? 73
- The maps below show a book store in 2000 and now. Summarise the main information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, then, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67177843393 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.556708148 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222498376896 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980388134026 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799970367184 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137850847148 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105271072898 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.