The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The changing rates of crime in the New Port city from 2003-2012
Changes in three different areas of crime in New Port city.
The line graph illustrate the changing rate of three types of crime that happened in Newport city centre between 2003 and 2012.
The number of incidents of burglary was the highest position while the lowest position was robber, just around 3400 and 700 respectively in 2003.There was a slight increase of burglary at 3800 in 2004,a rise of 400 in one year.After that the changing rate of burglary decreased significantly every year till 2008 and the figure was near about 1200.Car theft was the second highest position at approximately 2800 in 2003.From 2003,the incidents rate of car theft fell gradually in next three years at 2100 and finally reached at a peak at 3200 in 2012.On the other hand,robbery was fluctuated of it's changing rate whole the period and reached the point that it started in 2003.
To conclude, in Newport city the crime rate of robbery was always the lowest position over the 10 year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006 61
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 11
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 wo 100
- A line graph below shows the percentage of tourists who used different types of transportation in a particular country in 2015 90
- Essay topics: The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2018, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...round 3400 and 700 respectively in 2003.There was a slight increase of burglary at 38...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
... 3800 in 2004,a rise of 400 in one year.After that the changing rate of burglary decr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Car
...2008 and the figure was near about 1200.Car theft was the second highest position a...
^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
... position at approximately 2800 in 2003.From 2003,the incidents rate of car theft fe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...nally reached at a peak at 3200 in 2012.On the other hand,robbery was fluctuated o...
^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , robbery
...a peak at 3200 in 2012.On the other hand,robbery was fluctuated of its changing rate who...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the lowest position over the 10 year.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87820512821 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56745774074 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 22.4926829268 231% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 264.639377266 43.030603864 615% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 253.666666667 112.824112599 225% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.0 22.9334400587 227% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135046524296 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105844658673 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449693802558 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105844658673 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449693802558 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.6 13.2329268293 209% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 35.62 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 10.3012195122 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.9970731707 207% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.