The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different area of crime in new port city center form 2003 -2012

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different area of crime in new port city center form 2003 -2012

New graph represents the variation noticed in the three main area of crime in the center of Newport city form 2003 to 2012.
To start with, it was 3400 incident of burglary in 2003 and 3750 in 2004. Fortunately, in the next 4 year it fell down dramatically and reached the minimum figure of 1100 incidences. However, it then grew by 300 accidents and remained steady by 2012.
Car theft was a steady level of crime from 2003 to 2004 and got reduced in next 5 years from 2700 up to 2250. The number then increased to 2700 in 2012 as campared, Robbery reached its peak in 2005, which was 900 case and decreased back to 500 in 2008. In the following two years, the numbers of incidences rose to 700 snd continued to stay at this level in 2012.
Overall, the rate of burglary fell significantly, the level of robbery remained fairly constant, whereas car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-03 Jhand raman 56 view
Essays by user Jhand raman :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it was 3400 incident of burglary in 2003 and 3750 in 2004. Fortunately, in the ne...
^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was a steady level of crime from 2003 to 2004 and got reduced in next 5 years fro...
^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... years from 2700 up to 2250. The number then increased to 2700 in 2012 as campared, ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49101796407 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47794242157 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.592869053 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175176442071 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794257466751 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120636372681 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135074344886 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151097219372 0.0819641961636 184% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.