The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Given is a bar chart depicting the aggregate expenditure on three separate categories among distinct age groups in the UK in 2004. Perceptible, the total expenses of food and beverage and entertainment overshadowed the restaurant’s figure in the over-60s age while the opposite was true for the remaining ages.
In terms of the sums of money spent by the under-60 people, the proportion spent for F&B seems to surge uninterruptedly across their ages which was 6%, 13% and 17% respectively for the under-30s, the 31 to 35-year-olds and the 46 to 60-year-olds. Meanwhile, the 46 to 60-year-olds showed their strong bias for entertainment with 14% of total expenses recorded in comparison to 7% in other 2 age groups. Likewise, aggregate expenditure on restaurants and hotels are likely to gain traction from these age groups with about 13 to 14% recorded.
Regarding the over-60, there was a corresponding trend for F&B figures witnessed with 20% and 23%. Strikingly, the sum spending for entertainment in the 61 to 75-year-olds which exceeded by 10% the over-76s’ figure had a similar percentage to the F&B spent by the oldest age group. In contrast, these age groups seem not to be fond of restaurant and home expenditure with only 2% and 6% recorded respectively with increasing age groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- Some people think that detailed crime reports on newspapers and TV can have many disadvantages To what extent do you agree disagree 81
- NOWADAYS PARENTS PUT TOO MUCH PRESSURE ON THEIR CHILDREN TO SUCCEED WHAT IS THE REASON FOR DOING THIS IS THIS A NEGATIVE OR POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT 61
- Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery However some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities To what extent do you agree o 67
- Task 1 The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015
- Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery However some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities To what extent do you agree o 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, regarding, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09389671362 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23478607464 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3785874578 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.625 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135515993017 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752965232794 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859382860657 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110851383538 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561284362526 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, regarding, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09389671362 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23478607464 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3785874578 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.625 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135515993017 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752965232794 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859382860657 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110851383538 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561284362526 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.