The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

The given bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on resident’s goods consumption in France and the UK in 2010. As it is observed, in the UK, the expenditure on cars was highest in both countries, while perfume was used less in the UK and the expense spent on cameras was the lowest in France.
As it is presented in the bar chart, in the UK, the amount of money paid was mostly used in cars and books, which cost 450000 pounds and more than 400000 pounds repetitively. Besides, the expenditure on computers had the third highest position, with almost 400000 pounds, while cameras consumed the forth, with approximately 375000 pounds. On the contrary, perfume was good which had the lowest amount of money spent by British, with almost 150000 pounds and lower than the expenditure on cars 300000 pounds
On the other hand, in France, when compared to the UK, the amount of expense used in cars was highest, with 400000 pounds and lower than the UK exactly 50000 pounds. Above 350000 pounds were paid for computers and almost 300000 pounds were used to afford books. Nevertheless, perfume and cameras are goods which had the lowest expenditure by French.
In conclusion, the amount of money spent on consuming goods in the UK was higher than France. Among 5 goods, cars had the highest expenditure when residents bought goods.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, nevertheless, third, while, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83913043478 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50164785011 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421739130435 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0698184824 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124988613105 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717205822995 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494926666039 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945450064493 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028021944491 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.