The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart gives information about the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. The data presents in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that Japan increased while Tunisia and Ecuador experienced decrease.
In the one hand in 2007, Tunisia gained at 6% to 7% approximately which the biggest category initially. Than followed by Japan which stood at 2% obviously was the second biggest percentage. However, the smallest percentage was Ecuador which market at around 3% to 4% roundly.
On the other hand in 2007 to 2010, Japan’s percentage of GDP growth per year happened to be increase which was standing at about 4% to 5% estimately. In contrast, the percentage of GDP growth per year of Tunisia and Ecuador had to be decreased during the same period. Tunisia dropped which stood at around 4% to 3% whilst Ecuador’s percentage declined which noted at about 2% to 0% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Arman Mansyur | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of the educational setting in the UK in 2010. 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh than the disadvantages? 56
- The pie charts bellow show the comparison of the different kinds of energy production of france in two years 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...y which the biggest category initially. Than followed by Japan which stood at 2% obv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Than” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y which the biggest category initially. Than followed by Japan which stood at 2% obv...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01960784314 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9001201252 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3010529966 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255864299796 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122962717681 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205193185106 0.0843802449381 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206558163299 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162668745477 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.