The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart compares three different nations, namely Algeria, China and Argentina, in terms of changes in real estate values from 2007 to 2010.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the prices of property in China experienced enormous growth over the period shown. While Algeria showed a steady decline in its figures, Argentina’s property prices had a dramatic oscillation.
In 2007, Algeria accounted for the highest percentage with over 6%, double that of Argentina and three times higher than that of China. However, during the following years, this country witnessed an awful decrease, down to 4.5% in 2008 and only 3% in 2010. By contrast, in the period from 2007 to 2010, the realty development rate in China constantly rose like a rocket and reached a peak of about 7% in 2010.
Towards Argentina, between 2007 to 2008, the figures for Argentina went up rapidly to approximately 5% before dropping suddenly to over 1% in the next year and ending at nearly 2.3% in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | harvle | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | Võ Ngân | 61 | view |
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information on the performance of a train company in October and November in 2008 74
- The chart below shows the average cost of the monthly contract for four di erent mobiles cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 95
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99411764706 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68766888099 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664705882353 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9638681436 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287136045608 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11419923402 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506394135516 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151385877958 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062245618471 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.