Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract local people to visit these places?
There is a sad fact that museums and other venues of cultural significance nowadays have been receiving a lack of attention from the local population compared to visitor coming from abroad. In this essay, I will outline why this phenomenon happens and propose some solutions to tackle it.
To embark with, I believe that the primary reason for having fewer native dwellers in historical areas and museums is the familiarity. In fact, local populace, who have been affected the most by cultural and historical sites in their town since they were kids, are already a part of the culture in their living habitat. This is why many Parisians do not pay a visit the Eiffel Tower, for example, because they already see it every day, and spending money to explore it is simply a waste. Conversely, when foreign tourists pace to a strange city for the first time, what they want to know are culture and history of that place. Therefore, these positions of cultural and historical significance is really a dreaming land for them. This explains why the number of visitors of cultural and historical destinations are the majority of foreigners.
However, I will contribute some remedies to improve the situation. Firstly, museums should use a system of special exhibit and change the arrangement to make it more interesting, which may foster the interest of indigenous people. The Hanoi museum, for instance, has recently finished in building that has attracted a huge number of domestic visitors, mainly young people, come to experience thanks to its artistic design. Secondly, changing artworks frequently is also a way to bring novelty. This way, locals might find it more worthwhile to spend their leisure time to explore local museums, since there is always something new to see every time.
In conclusion, it can be realized that the cause why many museums and historical spots are empty of local citizen is due to the familiarity, and as such, this can be fixed by dynamic exhibition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-01 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
- The given bar graphs show the extent of cash that individuals in France, Germany and England spent on nourishment and different items in 1998 and 2008. 73
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 89
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00906344411 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67965101608 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598187311178 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8821950588 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242919758459 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674145077106 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567547558339 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142494459464 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688532348721 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00906344411 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67965101608 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598187311178 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8821950588 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242919758459 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674145077106 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567547558339 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142494459464 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688532348721 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.