The chart below shows Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040

Essay topics:

The chart below shows Japan’s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040.

The line chart illustrates the percentage of the Japanese population in different age groups from 1960 until now, and projection for the year 2040.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that 25 - 64 years old group was the highest in all period shown. On the other hand, residents in this country more and more ageing, the opposite was true with both remaining communities.
In 1960, about 65% of people living in Japan between the ages of 15 and 64, more than doubled that of 0-14 old group, at exactly 30%. In 1970, the number of citizens from 15 to 64 old increased by about 5% to almost 70% and remained fairly unchanged through the three decades ensuing before falling to around 60% in 2019. This figure is predicted to experience a fall to 55% in 2030 and finally will constitute roughly 58% of the total population of Japan in 2040. The data for those aged 0-14 follow a somewhat similar pattern, which is estimated to drop to about 10% in 2040 after had a slight increase to approximately 35% in 1970.
Regarding the other group, the proportion of Japanese people aged 65 and over was only 5% in 1960. However, the figures witnessed a significant growth to nearly 30% in 2020 and it is forecast that about around 35% of Japan's people will fall into this group.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-12 dorae 78 view
2022-08-28 jaspreet singh11 84 view
2022-05-22 kevann 73 view
2022-01-22 phanhhh 78 view
2021-12-01 HonZun 67 view
Essays by user Nguyen Manh Dung :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, regarding, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59825327511 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4714666593 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615720524017 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5055316845 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242762483135 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101064382323 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811426211459 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156165111074 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870532632681 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, regarding, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59825327511 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4714666593 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615720524017 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5055316845 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242762483135 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101064382323 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811426211459 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156165111074 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870532632681 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.