Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental issues have become an important topic among individuals and governments in the modern world. It is argued that the role of people in protecting surroundings is not trivial and environmental preservation works are only really effective when organized by authorities and big firms. Personally, I think that this is a flawed argument, and this essay will outline my reasoning.
To begin with, it is undoubtedly that governments play a major position in improving nature. Competent agencies can enact laws and other severe punishments to deter and prevent individuals or business organizations deliberately harming the habitat. For example, Singapore, the cleanest city in the globe, its reputation thanks to a series of extremely strict regulations with unbelieved fines such as the feeding of pigeons in public places is 500 USD or carrying cigarettes in person without permission is 3500 USD and strategies for developing " garden in the city", " wall garden", "roof garden", " garden everywhere". In addition, environment improvement should be considered by businesses as a part of their corporate culture. Instead of putting profit on top priority, such as they could produce products by environmentally friendly materials or invest in advanced waste treatment systems and sustainable development projects.
On the other hand, Each dwellers' role in enhancing the environment should not be underestimated. In fact, on average, per person releases approximately 1.8 kilograms of waste, especially non-recyclable plastic products on a daily basis. Consequently, many beaches and the surrounding ecosystems have been badly polluted, causing the death of various marine creatures. Therefore, citizens should limit using plastic bags and plastic merchandises that can not be recycled. Secondly, inhabitant's commuting is also one of the main factors making air pollution and global warming. Particularly, the need for owning private vehicles is on the rise, from that, the amount of CO2, CO, SO2 and so on emitted is increasing day by day. Only when people restrict travel by individual vehicles and switch to using public transports will air quality be improved.
In conclusion, with the reasons aforementioned above, I believe that preserving habitat is a common responsibility and in order to perform well the preservation of the surroundings, there must be the participation of governments, companies and residents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-28 | Fay Phan Nguyen | 89 | view |
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in five di erent age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000 84
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sportspeople and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 89
- The tables below show results of a survey of urban residents opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 89
- The chart below give information about the highspeed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dwellers'' or 'dweller's'?
Suggestion: dwellers'; dweller's
...nt projects. On the other hand, Each dwellers role in enhancing the environment shoul...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71273712737 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36982689264 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647696476965 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8243922229 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987072280063 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329113737836 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305579632711 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491737491982 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162323464367 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.