The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion in average estate values in Algeria, china and Argentina from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, there was a downward trend of the figure of property prices in Algeria while china witnessed an upward trend over the period. It is also clear that the percentage of the estate values fluctuated wildly in Argentina.
In 2007, the percentage of average property prices was the highest in Algeria, at approximately 6.2% which was three times higher in china. there was a considerable decrease in that of Algeria at exactly 3.0% in 2010. By contrast, the figure of the estate values in china experienced a significant increase and reached the peak at over 6.5% in 2010.
Meanwhile, to begin with over 3.0% in 2007, the proportion in the estate values in Argentina reached nearly 5.0% in the next year. After hitting the low at around 1.2% in 2009, argentina’s value doubled by the end of this period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | harvle | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | Võ Ngân | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
- Hogwards Grammar School 56
- Many people believe that the main aim for university education is to help graduates to find better job, while some people believe that university education has wider benefit individual and society. discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 60
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... which was three times higher in china. there was a considerable decrease in that of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96835443038 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74231822466 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525316455696 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4559869267 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.125 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176640910415 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827344078418 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748893134847 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11649491575 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642463913341 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.