Hogwards Grammar School
The two diagrams illustrate how Hogwarts grammar school was advanced from 2004 to 2010.
Overall, it is immediately clear that remarkable developments had taken place on Hogwarts grammar school. On the other hand, the number of students experienced a significant increase over the period of 6 years.
In 2004, only 600 students attended to Hogwarts grammar school. Obviously, the school consisted of a sport area with a car park to the east( connected with a main road) and a school building to the west, connected to the sport area by a footpath.
In 2010, the number of students rose considerably of 400 students. We can see that the school building was renamed into a school building 1. The sport field was reduced in size to make way for adding school buildings 2 and 3 with the school building 2 lied to the north of the playground and the school building 3 was built just west of the playground and south of the school building 1. Furthermore, a original walking path was reconstructed like a road junction among three school buildings. There was an extra car park situated in the main road to the west of the school buildings 1 and 3.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them.In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefit 73
- Hogwards Grammar School 56
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 84
- The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... of the school building 1. Furthermore, a original walking path was reconstructed...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73631840796 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7329875702 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4022977456 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308244695651 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13908454153 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880807416739 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202768493027 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275022257997 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.