The bar chart compares data on five most famous types of mobile phone sold in the world from 2009 to 2013.
Overall, there were upward trends in the number of brands namely Samsung, Apple and ZTE, but the contrasting trends happened to the two other brands ( Nokia and LG). It can be seen that Samsung and Nokia were the two most popular types among users during the period.
In 2009, the number of Nokia phone sold worldwide was about 450 million, which was the highest number in five brands. However, it decreased slightly to just over 400 million in 2011 before sharply falling to only around 250 million in the end of the period. The similar trend can be seen for LG, the figure for it was about 150 million in 2009, but then dropped gradually by approximately 100 million by the year 2013.
turning to the remaining brands, around 250 million Samsung phones sold in 2009, which was higher than the other brands in the same year, except for Nokia. this figure then rose dramatically by about 100 million every 2 years and reached the peak of around 450 million by 2013. Specially, in 2009, users bought Apple phones least, but the growth of this brand was significant during 4 years, it increased about sixfold compared to the first year shown. Also the number of ZTE phone sold in the world climbs slightly druring the years, to approximately over 50 million in 2013.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trends happened to the two other brands Nokia and LG. It can be seen that Samsun...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Turning
...ximately 100 million by the year 2013. turning to the remaining brands, around 250 mil...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nds in the same year, except for Nokia. this figure then rose dramatically by about ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...xfold compared to the first year shown. Also the number of ZTE phone sold in the wor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63524590164 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17327142974 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504098360656 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6365582012 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.1 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173947176577 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817535426396 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745789194514 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134266776932 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880182627338 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.