The line graph illustrates data about the amount of carbon dioxide emissions that each person released in four different countries, measured in metric tonnes, over a 40-year period from 1967.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that Italy and Portugal saw upward trends in the amount of emissions during four decades. Whereas the opposite trends happened with the other two nations ( Britain and Sweden).
Looking at the details, as regards the United Kingdom, despite sawing a downward trend, the amount of carbon dioxide was by far highest among four countries. Starting at about 11 in 1967, the figure then fell gradually to around 9 in the end of the period. In terms of Sweden, having climbed slightly in the first year by over 1 to more than 10, after that the figure dropped considerably year on year and finished at higher than 5 in 2007.
By contrast, about 1 and above 4 metric tonnes of emissions were discharged by an Italian and a Portugese respectively in 1967. At this point, these two figures grew steadily more or less than 4 throughout the years shown. This meant that Italy became the second polluted country and the quatities of carbon dioxide in Sweden and Portugal were the same in 2007.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
- a survey conducted for the places in which people gain access the internet from 1998 to 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ends happened with the other two nations Britain and Sweden Looking at the det...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, then, whereas, as regards, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34452611866 2.54303337028 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 127.690721649 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57619047619 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 290.88556701 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6804123711 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 210.0 16.3608247423 1284% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 44.8134815571 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 995.0 76.5299724578 1300% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 210.0 16.8248392259 1248% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 68.0 4.34317383033 1566% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173089332894 0.216113520407 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173089332894 0.0766984524023 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109201574856 0.12726935374 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240753190242 0.0580467560999 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 105.9 8.37731958763 1264% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -124.75 70.7449484536 -176% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 3.82989690722 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 82.8 7.45979381443 1110% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.69 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.59 7.59969072165 231% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 8.62886597938 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 86.0 8.54432989691 1007% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 86.0 8.15463917526 1055% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.