The graph depicts the percentage of people in the USA eating frequently in junk food restaurant during10 years since 2003. The most significant facts to emerge from the graph are that the figure for once or twice a month and that for a few times a year experienced an increase while other frequencies witnessed a decrease.
Looking in details, it is clearly seen that there was a growth of once or twice a month figure, rising slightly from around 30 to about 33 -the maximum number in this statistical data. Likewise, a few times a year figure saw a gradual increase to roughly 15 before leveling off at the end of the timeline.
However, the figures several times a week and that for once a week had a similar pattern. Not only did the former climb to nearly 33 in 2006 and witnessed a noticeable fall to approximately 27 but the latter rose to roughly 33 and then declined to 27 as well in 2013. At the same time, the timeline experienced a moderate drop in the proportion of people eating every day and never in a fast food restaurant in 2006 before remaining stable at around 2 -the smallest percentage of eating frequency at fast food restaurant during over 10 years.
- Some people say that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places or crowded areas, while others disagree. Discuss and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 69
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the smallest'.
Suggestion: -the the smallest
...006 before remaining stable at around 2 -the smallest percentage of eating frequency at fast ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, look, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58490566038 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62681221244 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5421761912 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.857142857 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146091256017 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659284952035 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100850784929 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09177767321 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651354511699 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.