The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The graph depicts the percentage of people in the USA eating frequently in junk food restaurant during10 years since 2003. The most significant facts to emerge from the graph are that the figure for once or twice a month and that for a few times a year experienced an increase while other frequencies witnessed a decrease. In addition, the figure for once a week and that for once or twice a month showed them superiority over that for other frequencies during the period.
In 2003, it is clearly seen that people who ate once a week and once or twice a month in a fast food restaurant have a larger percentage, which accounted for around 30s. These were followed by the figure for several times a week and that for a few times a year. While the former was recorded at about 17, the latter was listed at roughly 13. Besides, there were the smaller percentage of people in the USA eating every day and never in this kind of restaurant, which was noted at approximately 5s.
10 years later, there was a growth of once or twice a month figure, rising slightly from around 30 to about 33. Likewise, a few time a year figure saw a gradual increase to roughly 15 before leveling off. The figure for several times a week and that for once a week, however, had a similar pattern, climbing to nearly 33 and 20 each in 2006, then witnessed a noticeable fall to approximately 27 and 16 respectively at the end of the period. At the same time, the timeline experienced a moderate drop in the proportion of people eating every day and never in a fast food restaurant in 2006 before remaining stable at around 2.5 and 4 successively.
- Some people say that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places or crowded areas, while others disagree. Discuss and give your own opinion. 56
- The bar chart below show the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atter was listed at roughly 13. Besides, there were the smaller percentage of peo...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...from around 30 to about 33. Likewise, a few time a year figure saw a gradual increase to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, likewise, then, while, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49324324324 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61729058519 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476351351351 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6163795935 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.909090909 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131743553388 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626940529736 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915314890168 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10023069695 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320560312844 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.