The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The above bar graph gives information about the frequency of eating in fast food restaurants in the USA during the period of ten years from 2003 until 2013.
Overall, it is clear that high proportion of American citizens have eaten fast food one a week in 2003 and 2006. While, in 2013 most of them have gone to restaurants once or twice a month.
According to the chart, almost 5% of American people ate at fast food eating places every day which was reduced and remained still for both 2006 and 2013. People who went several times a week to those places in all three years were higher than 15%, but in 2006 reached 20 percent. Great percentage of individuals in USA with more than 30 were eating one a week in those restaurants.
In 2013, high percentage in the whole graph was allocated to people who ate once or twice a week in fast food restaurants with almost 35. Approximately, 13% ate at those eating places a few times a year which rose to exact 15% in two other years. Finally, as like every day figure, percentage of citizen who ate never at fast food restaurants were 5% in 2003 that had a slight decline to near 4% in other years.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 84
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent 73
- Topic the tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 84
- Nowadays there have been a discussion about people s weight and their physical condition Although walking has been one of the practical way for staying in shape In these days many people haven t gone walking for many diverse reasons which will be mentione 56
- living in cities or countryside is one of the main decision for humans to make discuss advantages and disadvantages for both of them and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41981132075 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37523771084 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8798126001 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294451705798 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127358885699 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778862232239 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188810929677 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352993692382 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.