The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The frequency of people consuming junk food at restaurant in the USA is presented in the bar graph from 2003 to 2013.
Clearly, the percentage of frequency on consuming junk food by people in USA rose by a year, but other categories dipped. Most Americans consumed fast food in once a week or month.
Many Americans ate junk food in once a week and twice a month with less than a third. The former saw a significant drop by one in twenty, while the latter rose slightly to the same as the former. People in USA eating junk food in several times a week peaked at 20% in 2006 before declined by one in ten.
Less than a fifth of those in few time a year was steady in the last seven years. This contrasted to that consuming frequency in daily was not as much proportion as in never, accumulated with a very small number, and the figure for every day and never eating junk food decreased by 1%.
- Some people agree that trains are better transportation between cities However some argue that planes are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 11
- Population in Oman and Spain 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The chain of meal production s phases in United States can be seen from the diagram 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...rmer. People in USA eating junk food in several time a week peaked at 20% in 2006 before dec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...n ten. Less than a fifth of those in few time a year was steady in the last seven yea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ith a very small number, and the figure for every day and never eating junk food decreased by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34911242604 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37349662365 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3205902735 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192991677671 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09114020926 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840632996033 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140130029253 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916766060592 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.