The bar chart compares the average house prices in five cities of two periods with the prices in 1989.
Over the period of 1990-1995, the prices in London and Tokyo were both cut down drastically by about 7% from 1989. In the following period, the prices in tokyo had slightly increased and it became -5% in comparison with 1989 average house cost, whereas in London, it had grown up extremely and exceeded the mark of 10%, which is the highest mark.
However, Madrid and Frankfurt were the only cities with an increase in costs in the first period, 1% and 2% respectively. In 1996-2002, the average prices in both cities increased but the pattern for them was the opposite, 4% and 1% more than in 1989. Additionally, In New York, prices became 5% lower in 1990-1995and in 1996-2002, it was 5% higher than the average prices in 1989 .
Overall, Tokyo remained as the only city where prices were lower than in 1989, whereas in other cities it raised.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...% higher than the average prices in 1989 . Overall, Tokyo remained as the only ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45725332521 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5029603352 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331418601023 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18064730324 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117869912851 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240404186812 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123812919374 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.