The figure shows the average change in house prices in 5 different cities in various countries from 1990 to 2002 compared to 1989. From an overall perspective, it can be observed that the costs of the house fall in New York, Tokyo, and London between 1990 and 1995. This trend reversed for New York and London, and only Tokyo faced a negative change in house price over eight following years.
The chart depicts that in the first five years, from 1990 to 1995, Frankfurt and Madrid's house prices witnessed an increment compared with 1989 with 2.5% and 2% change, respectively. Meanwhile, in New York, Tokyo, and London, the house cost decreased and faced negative changes -5%, 8%, and 9%, respectively.
In the eight following years, the house prices become higher than in 1989 in all cities except Tokyo. Although the percentage change in Tokyo's house cost becomes higher than the first period, it remains negative. However, the trend of London house prices reverses and has the highest rate of change with 12%. The change percentage of house prices in theNew York and Madrid ranks second and third with 5% and 4%. While the change proportion of house prices in Frankfurt decreases by 2% in the second period compared with the first period.
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n house price over eight following years The chart depicts that in the first five...
^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd period compared with the first period
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70754716981 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30144211603 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448113207547 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 212.0 22.4926829268 943% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 998.0 112.824112599 885% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 212.0 22.9334400587 924% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 46.0 5.23603664747 879% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353745703534 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.353745703534 0.103423049105 342% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266671392098 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226943438507 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 106.8 13.2329268293 807% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -126.78 61.2550243902 -207% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 83.6 10.3012195122 812% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.52 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.98 8.06136585366 211% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 86.8 10.9970731707 789% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 52.0 11.0658536585 470% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.