The information given in the graph below elucidates public transports usage in one country in 2016. In overall, the proportions of citizens in each group of age in large cities were seen with significant fluctuations, where as other residents remained quite stable.
Started at 40% plus experienced a sharp boom, big city people aging from 31 to 45 years old were likely to commute by non-personal vehicles most as the line reached a peak at nearly 70%. Following was an enormous decline when it moved to the next 15 year-old group, continued to fall and reached the lowest at 10%. Finally saw a small increase to 15% at the age of 76 and above.
Meanwhile, citizens living on other places used public vehicle mostly around 16 and 30 years old, 10% higher than 0-15 and 31-45 groups (15% in both). After that nearly no changes were found in the next 15 years then saw a gradual growth by 5% and fell rapidly to lower than 10% at 76+ groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ere seen with significant fluctuations, where as other residents remained quite stable. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... to fall and reached the lowest at 10%. Finally saw a small increase to 15% at the age ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60355029586 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46384166258 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704142011834 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2302369913 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174494515745 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095001906952 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120527581879 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140469824968 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126143826566 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.