The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the number of the US households in five kinds of annual income levels between 2007 and 2015.

Overall, the number of American families showed the three different trends in annual income from 2007 to 2015. Furthermore, the number of households which the annual income level in the $75,000-$99,999 was the least, while the annual income level in the $100,000 or more was the highest in 2007 and 2015.

It is clear that the number of households which annual income level less than $25,000 and $25,000-$49,999 were in the same trend from 2007 to 2015, which showed an upward trend in 2011 and then in a downward tendency in 2015.

However, the number of US families which annual income in $100,000 or more was in the opposite trend, which showed a decline trend in 2011 and sharply increased in 2015. There are 29 millions households by annual income level in $100,000 or more in 2007 but decreased in 27 millions in 2011 and then sharply increased in 34 millions in 2015.

Meanwhile, the number of household which annual income levels between $50,000 and $74,999 and $75,000-$99,999 kept stable trend, which had not too much fluctuations.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-07 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-07 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-07 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-07 hahoaan 73 view
2024-06-13 lavien 84 view
Essays by user MinyiChu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...99 kept stable trend, which had not too much fluctuations.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79292929293 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38745766168 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414141414141 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.6003898167 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.571428571 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280199109302 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18726131659 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059633050748 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208504175745 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692484804862 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.