The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual ’ income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the number of US households categorized by anuual income, for the years 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Overall, upon analyzing the data, it is evident that there is no clear trend in the number of households across various income groups. It is noticeable that the lowest number of households consistently fall in the range $75,000 - $99,999 annual income.
Approximately 25 millions of households earned less then $25,000 in 2007. Five years later, the figure witnessed a moderate increase where it gone up to nearly 30 millions of households and finally slightly went down to roughly 28 millions in 2015. Another similar trend occured in the range between $25,000 - $49,999 annual income. In the first year, more than 25 millions of households were in this group of income, the figure increased to nearly 30 millions in the next five years and then slightly dropped to about 28 millions of households.
The number of households in the range $50,000 - $74,999 annual income remained steady over the years with more than 20 millions. The group between $75,000 - $99,999 annual income steadily hovering about 15 millions of households. Lastly, the number of households with an annual income exceeding $100,000 went from nearly 30 millions to roughly 27 millions, and finally experienced a significant increase to approximately 33 millions in 2015.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '25 million'
Suggestion: 25 million
...- 9,999 annual income. Approximately 25 millions of households earned less then 5,000 in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less than'?
Suggestion: less than
...mately 25 millions of households earned less then 5,000 in 2007. Five years later, the fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...y 25 millions of households earned less then 5,000 in 2007. Five years later, the fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '30 million'
Suggestion: 30 million
...ate increase where it gone up to nearly 30 millions of households and finally slightly went...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '28 million'
Suggestion: 28 million
...d finally slightly went down to roughly 28 millions in 2015. Another similar trend occured ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '25 million'
Suggestion: 25 million
...al income. In the first year, more than 25 millions of households were in this group of inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '30 million'
Suggestion: 30 million
... income, the figure increased to nearly 30 millions in the next five years and then slightl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '28 million'
Suggestion: 28 million
...ears and then slightly dropped to about 28 millions of households. The number of househ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '20 million'
Suggestion: 20 million
...ed steady over the years with more than 20 millions. The group between 5,000 - 9,999 annual...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '15 million'
Suggestion: 15 million
...9 annual income steadily hovering about 15 millions of households. Lastly, the number of ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '30 million'
Suggestion: 30 million
...ncome exceeding 00,000 went from nearly 30 millions to roughly 27 millions, and finally exp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '27 million'
Suggestion: 27 million
...went from nearly 30 millions to roughly 27 millions, and finally experienced a significant ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 412, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '33 million'
Suggestion: 33 million
...a significant increase to approximately 33 millions in 2015.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, lastly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14155251142 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67943129942 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.573206745 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187309334154 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960557302425 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610896333695 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152366959213 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650721540723 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.