The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the annual income of the number of house owners who lives in the United States in three 2007, 2011, and 2015 years.
It is obvious that by 2007 and 2015 there were upward trend by income of people who have home and there was an exception in 2011 that has downward trend rather than others. The highest number was related to 2015 and the lowest number was in 2007.
As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 million and then recover to their first location in 2015. In contrast, the households who have 100000 or more income annually decreased first in 2011 and raise more than 34 million that was the heights point among all others. The incomes related to 75000-99999$ declined in 2007 and 2011 about 1 million and reached 15 million in 2015. Although there were lots of changing in the owner’s income in the United States the people included 50000-74999$ did not change in these years.
In conclusion, the point is that the number of household’s income who gain less than 49999$ decreased and people received more incomes in 2015.
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant 78
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... an exception in 2011 that has downward trend rather than others. The highest number ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$25000'.
Suggestion: $25000
...07. As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...74999$ did not change in these years. In conclusion, the point is that the num...
^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$49999'.
Suggestion: $49999
...f household’s income who gain less than 49999$ decreased and people received more inco...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69072164948 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33768427627 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8789223367 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228198763728 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113928499313 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574845687515 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164530668254 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348235617895 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.