The given bar graph portrays indicators of male and female students in part-time and full-time education in Britain during 1970-71, 1980-81, 1990-91 years.
At first glance, it is clear that more numbers of students chose part-time education, than full-time education was chosen less by them.
Now turning the details of part-time education the figure of the women students increased by 11000000 at the end of the given period. The figure for boys remained decrease from 1 million to 850000 in 1980-81, but the digits rose to near 9 million by the end of the period, in this sector. The graph gives the figure about full-time education, the largest digits were used by boys(over 200000) in 1990-91 years, while the indicators of girls were under 200 thousand at the same time.
We can see that in 1970-71 the numbers of both genders in full-time education were about 50000, the digits of part-time choosers were 15 times more at the same time.
- most people agree that money cannot be happiness why is happiness difficult to understand how can people achieve happiness 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school(s) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school. 89
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88198757764 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44659007945 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7856569823 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278716859966 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15709885964 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729543925608 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20246443884 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306026341482 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.