The supplied chart outlines information of males and females in further education in The United Kingdom in 1970/1, 1980/1and 1990/1 divided between full-time and part-time study options. Data are showed in thousands.
It is obviously seen from the data that part -time education had opposite trend between two genders, when full-time education showed increasing tendency over two decades.
In 1970/71 male students have been majority of part-time education (1000), when female students had been represented just under 800. Over two decades number of female students rose to nearly 1200, when male students in further education were only about 900.
However, full-time education showed ascending trend over twenty years in both gender groups. In 1970/71 both groups had nearly 100, when in 1990/91 male as well as female had similarly about 220 full-time students.
To sum up, it is seen that female students in further education have been represented more than male students.
- Some people assert that it is good for students to have part time-jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 73
- The Process of Milk Production 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ps had nearly 100, when in 1990/91 male as well as female had similarly about 220 full-tim...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48684210526 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46804368118 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9131105581 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229626867856 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115193728152 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679850226174 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14597742744 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722564995876 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.