The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

The bar chart compares how many visitors used three different important airports in New York City over a period of 6 years.
It is clear that all the number of travelers of these airports increased considerably over the period shown. Additionally, LaGuardia was the most popular airport for passengers.
In 1995, the number of visitors choosing the LaGuardia airport was highest, at about 36 million, while the figure for the Newark was significantly lower, at only around 17 million. Meanwhile, about approximately 28 million passengers who used the John F. Kennedy airport. In 1997, the figures for the John F. Kennedy, the LaGuardia, the Newark were steady increases, at 47 million, just over and under 40 million respectively.
Between 1998 and 2000, the number of travelers using the LaGuardia continued to grow to 68 million and became the highest figure in the chart, whereas the John F. Kennedy's figure saw a considerable rise to roughly 43 million in 2000. At the same time, the figure for the Newark remained stable at slightly above 40 million

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-02 faraj27 67 view
2019-11-12 Dang Thi Truc Linh 56 view
2019-10-12 Lia Bui 73 view
2019-10-07 asasasss 78 view
2019-09-25 Hendra 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05714285714 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76713068808 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.442353014 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2250830572 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887520305443 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090664353228 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157411044543 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774200610242 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.